Category talk:Keywords/Evergreen

Re: Automatic approach
Just curious, what sorts of automation are you thinking of here? --Corveroth (talk) 23:37, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Ideally nav and infoboxes supply the categories for most pages. This is especially true for such technical things as keywords. Evergreen is not as technical since there is a design choice involved, if a keyword is evergreen or not.
 * So could we put a flag in the infobox if the keyword counts is evergreen. This is probably the most straight forward variant and has the positive effect that it hides the categorization from the more casual users, which helps to keep the technical sections clean.
 * Another a bit more editorial approach would work with something like I did in Activate. You see as I added the infobox I was pretty sure that something in BFZ activates, so I decided to put Evergreen in there since I would need to change that thing to OGW in a few days anyway, but I was to lazy to confirm either way. The question is if we do this for all Evergreen things. Which would result in less updates to all pages and it would be pretty easy to add a category. (if last is evergreen categorize as such).
 * Or we categorize the first and last sets all the times. I noticed on Alara and Tarkir keywords, we sometimes have the nav in which adds the categories for the block, we could do something more general with infobox, which would fit into the Last=Evergreen approach I mentioned.
 * There are a few more options, but these are the first thoughts that spring to my mind. - Yandere Sliver H09 symbol.png 00:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * In other words, roll it into the core infoboxes and navboxes. Agreed. --Corveroth (talk) 00:41, 30 December 2015 (UTC)