User talk:Archlich631

prerev
Hi and thanks for your help! You asked about prerevisionist sources few times, so I thought I'd explain. There are two policies concerning it. First says that any place/person/event/other thing that appeared or was mentioned in any form in pre-rev sources (so its concept was created before revision started) has Category:Prerevisionist. Second rule is that all pre-rev info is canon unless revisionist sources contradict them. Sure, you're right that it should be clearly marked where is revisionist part and where pre-rev one. Although, so far articles with mixed pre-rev/rev are rather rare or saying about different time periods - so there is no real problem. Anyway, creating more clear distinction between pre-rev and rev info in articles is a matter of (hopefully, near) future. -- M ORT  (T) 21:29, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok, I'm new to this site, so hopefully I'm doing everything correctly.

Thanks for the information.

It's ok. But remember to sign your messages. Just write ~. -- M ORT  (T) 22:16, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok, I will. Archlich 22:35, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

geography info in planes articles
Hi, and thanks again for your great work. I just come to give one suggestion. In the Kamigawa article all locations should be only listed. Very locations should be in their own articles. The same goes for Mercadia and other planes. -- M ORT  (T) 20:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

What I meant is that it should be similiar to the article of Dominaria plane. All locations, major and minor (in case of Dominaria, only major, cuz otherwise it would be too much), should be just listed (with short description, optionally) and linked to their own respective articles. The "History of Mercadia" subtiltle would be ok as well. P.S. you meant Mercadia, not Mirrodin, I guess. ;-) -- M ORT  (T) 22:31, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Mirrodin is ok - like Dominaria. Some more things you have to remember about, when creating new articles are 1) bold the first appearence of the name of article in text, but if it has its own card, Baron Sengir it instead. 2)Categories! They're important. Full list of storyline categories is here. -- M ORT  (T) 09:00, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

sha/sah
There is an article called Ish Sah, but you sometimes use Ish Sha. Which one is correct? Just wanted to be sure... ;-) -- M ORT  (T) 20:33, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Then again, is it just Ish Sah, or Ish-Sah? Or both? -- M ORT  (T) 20:53, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I meant both, just had to check one for a turn ;-) -- M ORT  (T) 21:12, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

TajNar
Taj Nar or Taj-Nar? (Or both?) You used both. Also, remember to use categories when you start new articles. -- M ORT  (T) 20:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Phyrexia
Hi. And again, thanks for your contributions, Archlich. What are "bullets" you're talking about? Anyway, feel free to use anything, it can be always edited :). As for militarization section, I didn't put it there, but I think that all info about phyrexian weapons can be included there. Thnigs like soul-cutting weapons forged by Yawgmoth himself, about all kinds of ships that were used to attack Dominaria, etc. -- M ORT  (T) 16:11, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Do you mean Card tags? They work this way: As for any other things, you don't need permisions! It's a wiki, you can edit what you want. If something will be found wrong, then it can be debated. As for now, write all what you believe fits the topic of article. -- M ORT  (T) 21:10, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Phyrexian Colossus, what results with Phyrexian Colossus, or
 * Phyrexian Colossus, what results with Phyrexian Colossus


 * It's ok. You can bother me with anything. That's what I'm for ;-). I have only one suggestion. When you write article (like Phyrexia) try to write only about Phyrexia and things important for the plane itself and connected with it. I mean, detailed history of Invasion, or Rath have their own articles. It won't have much sense to write the whole, long, same story in every Phyrexian related article. just a suggestion... -- M ORT  (T) 21:35, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

RE:Dangers
From what I've seen you didn't "link it from your PC", you just uploaded it. The picture is already on the Hard drive of the server and has no connection to you computer (otherwise, picture wouldn't work every time you close your PC). It's as safe as uploading any other file anywhere else on the net. BTW, you uploaded one image of Terisiare we already had saved. Please, always check the maps category before uploading a new map. Also, when you upload new maps, give them that Category:Maps so they will be all together. As always, thanks for your work! -- M ORT  (T) 14:19, 9 November 2007 (GMT)

typing
Hmmm... I have no idea why did it happen then. Oh, and please, use my current talk page not archives. -- M ORT (T) 20:50, 29 June 2008 (UTC)