MTG Wiki
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Would people be okay with a merger of this article into the article into [[Legendary]]? --[[User:Thisjustout|Thisjustout]] ([[User talk:Thisjustout|talk]]) 14:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 
Would people be okay with a merger of this article into the article into [[Legendary]]? --[[User:Thisjustout|Thisjustout]] ([[User talk:Thisjustout|talk]]) 14:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 
: I'm ok with it if all the redirect point will direct to the right section --[[User:Hunterofsalvation|Hunter]] ([[User talk:Hunterofsalvation|talk]]) 14:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 
: I'm ok with it if all the redirect point will direct to the right section --[[User:Hunterofsalvation|Hunter]] ([[User talk:Hunterofsalvation|talk]]) 14:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
  +
:: Sounds good to me. --[[User:Corveroth|Corveroth]] ([[User talk:Corveroth|talk]]) 15:45, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:45, 26 February 2017

Okay, so, I've noticed about Mutavault, and how the "Legendary" supertype used to be the subtype Legend. Would the legend rule apply to Mutavault as a side effect of this or is Legend not counted? WindMasterArceus (talk) 15:25, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Article merger

Would people be okay with a merger of this article into the article into Legendary? --Thisjustout (talk) 14:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

I'm ok with it if all the redirect point will direct to the right section --Hunter (talk) 14:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Sounds good to me. --Corveroth (talk) 15:45, 26 February 2017 (UTC)