Some help needed. How come that the template for the preconstructed decks (commander decks) doesn't refer to the right page? --Hunter (talk) 16:44, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- I think the redirect got changed to have a lowercased d in "decks" now, so I changed it to reflect it. It should work now. Neo (talk) 18:43, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, it doesn't. It creates Zendikar Rising/TBA --Hunter (talk) 19:25, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- I think Yanderesliver figured something out. It looks like it works now by treating them like Eldraine's Brawl decks. Neo (talk) 20:33, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- The commander deck logic want to have one subpage per deck, but the brawl deck logic which works almost identical can life with one subpage. - Yandere Sliver
23:11, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- The commander deck logic want to have one subpage per deck, but the brawl deck logic which works almost identical can life with one subpage. - Yandere Sliver
- I think Yanderesliver figured something out. It looks like it works now by treating them like Eldraine's Brawl decks. Neo (talk) 20:33, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, it doesn't. It creates Zendikar Rising/TBA --Hunter (talk) 19:25, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Do we list both sides of a modal DFC when referring to the card?[]
- Pros: Easier to reference for readers; more complete info; arguably a default "front side" doesn't exist if either can be chosen in play, so both listings are valid.
- Cons: Hover on the back and the image still defaults to front side, which isn't useful; prerogative for DFCs is to only list the front side; listing both takes up more space, which imo looks ugly on the Cycle tables.
I vote only list the front side of a modal DFC, but would like to hear other opinions. Tm123123 (talk) 21:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- I would like to list both sides unless we refer to a specific effect that only one side has. Otherwise the listed information isn't really complete.
- Emeria's Call creates 4/4 Angel Warriors
- Riverglide Pathway // Lavaglide Pathway is part of a cycle of dual lands.
- This is also consistent how we handle split card (which essentially have two modes.
- Fire // Ice is a split card. But Ice let's you draw a card.
- - Yandere Sliver 16:05, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Regarding the pathway lands. I put them in the mega cycle category. I also upgraded them to show both sided. I think that is a rather clean way to display both sides of the card. Thoughts? - Yandere Sliver 15:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Regarding the pathway lands. I put them in the mega cycle category. I also upgraded them to show both sided. I think that is a rather clean way to display both sides of the card. Thoughts? - Yandere Sliver
Regarding the Pathway Lands[]
Shouldn't they listed as partial cycle (or even mega cycle) instead of double cycle? After all, it's pretty much known that they are not really a proper cycle here and would only be completed in upcoming sets. --Aeris Ventaile (talk) 14:56, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- good point. - Yandere Sliver
15:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Do these count as cycles?[]
Just now, I've been browsing Scryfall and I realized that this set has 3 mythics for the five main mono-colors: https://scryfall.com/search?q=set%3Aznr+rarity%3Am&unique=cards&as=grid&order=set Should we make two new cycles, one for Mythic Legendary Permanents and another for Mythic Creatures?
Theme Booster Cardlists[]
Could someone add a section with cardlists for the Theme Boosters?
~ Mando Jetii (talk) 18:44, 13 January 2021 (UTC)