MTG Wiki
Advertisement
MTG Wiki
6,038
pages

How do we want to handle this?[]

I already brought this up on the Slack, but this article gave us a ton of material we could work with. So much, in fact, that I think we'd have a hard time calling the work finished unless we tracked it along the way.

I'm open to ideas for how best to do so. My first instinct is to create a tracking page with the names of each entry in the alphabetical lists (at the bottom of the original article) under an initial upper heading. As editors integrate the information for each mechanic, move that entry to a second completed heading along with a signature and optional description. If someone has a cleaner or lower friction idea, let us know! --Corveroth (talk) 04:45, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

seems like a good idea to me. --Hunter (talk) 05:16, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Urgh, yes this article is a monster. But it is almost like a design bible of mtg. - Yandere Sliver H09 symbol.png 07:11, 7 June 2017 (UTC)