Hi, first thanks for your numerous contributions, especially in the past weeks. There is just one thing, I'd like to point out. It is now generally preferred to use the new templates template:DailyRef and Template:Comprehensive Rules instead of template:MTGref and Template:Rules. MTGref has the problem, that it does not work at all with articles put up since the last redesign (and does not work with a coulpe of old articles either), and Rules has no mechanism to show whether a rules entry is up-to-date.
If you need a guideline on how to use those templates, DailyRef has a description on the template page. CR on the other hand does not have a description yet, but you can see how it's used on the page about Flying. Category:Outdated gives a list of rules citation where the set given does not match the most recent set, that promted a rules update (i.e. Planechase).
Feel free to contact me, if you have any questions, and thanks again. Oracle of Truth 12:26, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- No problem. And thank you for advancing the list so much in such a short time. --Chaosof99 00:50, 18 September 2011 (EDT)
- I thought it fit here. I also added a note on the Marsh Threader/Cliff Threader mirrored pair in the Worldwake article a while back and that seemed to fit there. Chaosof99 05:24, 22 January 2012 (EST)
Zendikar: Native Americans
- It is how Mark Purvis described the Zendikar vampires at one point. Here is one reference found in an article on StarCityGames, though I believe to have heard this from a different source at the time, though possibly a derivative or quote of that article. Chaosof99 (talk) 16:02, 28 October 2012 (EDT)
- I looked into that with my trusty buddy Google Search but I kept finding it in the same contexts. While there are sort of similarities, I'm not sure if that's something I feel comfortable leaving in. --Magic Mage (talk!) 23:27, 28 October 2012 (EDT)
RE: M10 Rules Changes
Not entirely supportive of this change. Whilst the prior version by no means was good, it at least didn't pass itself of as being good; perhaps this is overly critical, and what I mean to say is that there remains room for improvement.
There are good points to this, though, and thank you for your contribution. --Magic Mage (talk!) 00:08, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Might there be references for this article? Cheers. --Magic Mage (talk!) 12:35, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Done. I can provide additional links when I get home. Chaosof99 (talk) 15:27, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Cool. Looks solid and good. --Magic Mage (talk!) 12:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)