MTG Wiki
Advertisement
MTG Wiki
6,115
pages

Thanks[]

Hi, first thanks for your numerous contributions, especially in the past weeks. There is just one thing, I'd like to point out. It is now generally preferred to use the new templates template:DailyRef and Template:Comprehensive Rules instead of template:MTGref and Template:Rules. MTGref has the problem, that it does not work at all with articles put up since the last redesign (and does not work with a coulpe of old articles either), and Rules has no mechanism to show whether a rules entry is up-to-date.

If you need a guideline on how to use those templates, DailyRef has a description on the template page. CR on the other hand does not have a description yet, but you can see how it's used on the page about Flying. Category:Outdated gives a list of rules citation where the set given does not match the most recent set, that promted a rules update (i.e. Planechase).

Feel free to contact me, if you have any questions, and thanks again. Oracle of Truth 12:26, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

I love the Lords article you created, it is one of many articles I think we have needed for awhile. Thanks for composing that list :) --GeoMike 17:12, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the latest article regarding the Timeline of DCI bans and restrictions --GeoMike 19:08, 17 September 2011 (EDT)

No problem. And thank you for advancing the list so much in such a short time. --Chaosof99 00:50, 18 September 2011 (EDT)

Cool add about those two cards, but maybe those sentences about Ancient Grudge and Ray of Revelation would be better suited in the Innistrad block article? --GeoMike 18:08, 21 January 2012 (EST)

I thought it fit here. I also added a note on the Marsh Threader/Cliff Threader mirrored pair in the Worldwake article a while back and that seemed to fit there. Chaosof99 05:24, 22 January 2012 (EST)

Great work on the The Great Designer Search and associated articles : ) --GeoMike 18:25, 4 June 2012 (EDT)

Zendikar: Native Americans[]

Apparently you're responsible for this edit. Would you care to explain yourself? Cheers. --Magic Mage (talk!) 11:56, 28 October 2012 (EDT)

It is how Mark Purvis described the Zendikar vampires at one point. Here is one reference found in an article on StarCityGames, though I believe to have heard this from a different source at the time, though possibly a derivative or quote of that article. Chaosof99 (talk) 16:02, 28 October 2012 (EDT)
I looked into that with my trusty buddy Google Search but I kept finding it in the same contexts. While there are sort of similarities, I'm not sure if that's something I feel comfortable leaving in. --Magic Mage (talk!) 23:27, 28 October 2012 (EDT)

RE: M10 Rules Changes[]

Not entirely supportive of this change. Whilst the prior version by no means was good, it at least didn't pass itself of as being good; perhaps this is overly critical, and what I mean to say is that there remains room for improvement.

There are good points to this, though, and thank you for your contribution. --Magic Mage (talk!) 00:08, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Pillowfort[]

Might there be references for this article? Cheers. --Magic Mage (talk!) 12:35, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Done. I can provide additional links when I get home. Chaosof99 (talk) 15:27, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Cool. Looks solid and good. --Magic Mage (talk!) 12:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Mark Rosewater[]

Good edits. MaRo would be proud. Hopefully. --Magic Mage (talk!) 12:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Advertisement